Sham Bhaskar Gadakh vs Vasant Narayan Sonwane Advocate - Khildkar R. D. — 401/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140007352024

e-Filing Number

24-04-2024

Filing Number

665/2024

Filing Date

24-Apr-2024

Registration No

401/2024

Registration Date

25-Apr-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sham Bhaskar Gadakh

    Adv. Kale H. B.

  2. 2.Pooja Alias Bebi Babasaheb Pawar

    Adv. Kale H. B.

  3. 3.Bahirnath Ramkisan Gore

    Adv. Kale H. B.

  4. 4.Navnath Ramkisan Gore

    Adv. Kale H. B.

  5. 5.Suman Deorao Pawar

    Adv. Kale H. B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Narayan Sonwane Advocate - Khildkar R. D.

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    Case 401/2024 Summary The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code to reject the plaintiff's suit for declaration and perpetual injunction was rejected. The court found that while the defendant argued the suit property was transferred to a third party before filing, the plaintiff's plaint sufficiently disclosed a cause of action. The question of whether the plaintiff had knowledge of the property transfer requires evidence to be brought on record and should be determined after hearing evidence, not at the rejection stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  10. 31-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  13. 04-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  14. 03-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  15. 30-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  16. 02-Sep-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  18. 30-Jul-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  19. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  20. 27-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  21. 02-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  22. 28-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  23. 01-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  24. 12-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  25. 07-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  26. 10-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  27. 04-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  28. 13-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  29. 17-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  30. 05-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  31. 08-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  32. 29-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 24-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 401/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 401/2024 Summary The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code to reject the plaintiff's suit for declaration and perpetual injunction was rejected. The court found that while the defendant argued the suit property was transferred to a third party before filing, the plaintiff's plaint sufficiently disclosed a cause of action. The question of whether the plaintiff had knowledge of the property transfer requires evidence to be brought on record and should be determined after hearing evidence, not at the rejection stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case