Manisha Sanjay Pehre vs Sukhdev Khanderao Kshirsagar Advocate - Garad B. S. — 283/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140005232024

e-Filing Number

22-03-2024

Filing Number

455/2024

Filing Date

22-Mar-2024

Registration No

283/2024

Registration Date

26-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,34
Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manisha Sanjay Pehre

    Adv. Shinde Vishal E.

  2. 2.Sarita Vijay Kharade

    Adv. Vishal Eknath Shinde

  3. 3.Ashwini Ajit Javale

    Adv. Vishal Eknath Shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sukhdev Khanderao Kshirsagar Advocate - Garad B. S.

  2. 2.Jayashri Vishnu Jadhav

  3. 3.Yogita Sandeep Kshirsagar

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The petition is dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the accused's detention violated procedural rights under IPC sections 9 and 40, and found that proper investigation procedures were followed. The court upheld the legality of the detention and dismissed claims of custodial misconduct, affirming that the case should proceed according to law dated 13 September 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  11. 07-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  15. 29-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  16. 13-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  17. 13-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  18. 23-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  19. 12-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  20. 10-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  21. 26-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 22-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition is dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the accused's detention violated procedural rights under IPC sections 9 and 40, and found that proper investigation procedures were followed. The court upheld the legality of the detention and dismissed claims of custodial misconduct, affirming that the case should proceed according to law dated 13 September 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case