Ashit Gorakshanath Abhang vs Bharat Bhaurao kale Advocate - Varma B. P. — 19/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,38. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140000222021

Filing Number

24/2021

Filing Date

04-Jan-2021

Registration No

19/2021

Registration Date

05-Jan-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 36,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashit Gorakshanath Abhang

    Adv. Hulhule S. G.

  2. 2.Pranav Gorakshanath Abhang

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Bhaurao kale Advocate - Varma B. P.

  2. 2.Gaytri Rajendra Kadam

    Adv. Fatangre B. R.

  3. 3.Gurunam Ramsingh Batra

    Adv. Varma B. P.

  4. 4.Nitin Madhukar Shahane

    Adv. Varma B. P.

  5. 5.Sharda Miling waykar

  6. 6.Miling Mhatardeo waykar

  7. 7.Prakash Kisan Ghule

  8. 8.Bhausaheb Chandrabhan kolte

  9. 9.Mahadeo Aasaram Mungse

  10. 10.Rutik Bandu Manikjade

  11. 11.Sanjay Dhondiram Mungse

  12. 12.Abhay Vittal Kolte

  13. 13.Aakash Ashok Chede

  14. 14.Dnyandeo Gorkshnath kadam

  15. 15.Ravindra Pandurang Abhang

  16. 16.Pankaj Ramchandra khatik

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Senior Division Newasa

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Amended W.S.

    Senior Division Newasa

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Amended W.S.

    Senior Division Newasa

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 19/2021 This case involves a property dispute concerning land in Kukan village. The petitioners (Ashit and Pranav Abhang) challenged respondents' claims over agricultural land (Plot 90/1). The core dispute centered on alleged unauthorized occupation of the disputed property and validity of prior land sales and transfers. The court examined testimony regarding boundaries, previous sale deeds, and construction of structures on adjacent plots. The court found that the respondents' occupation of the property was unlawful and that the petitioners had superior claims to the land. Petition allowed; respondents' encroachment on the disputed property declared invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Amended W.S.

    Senior Division Newasa

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Senior Division Newasa

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Senior Division Newasa

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Senior Division Newasa

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Senior Division Newasa

  14. 13-Aug-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Senior Division Newasa

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Senior Division Newasa

  16. 17-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Senior Division Newasa

  18. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  19. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 12-Mar-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  21. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  22. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  23. 28-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 28-Jan-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  25. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  26. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  27. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  28. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  29. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  30. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  31. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  32. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  33. 24-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  34. 12-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  35. 07-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  36. 13-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  37. 19-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  38. 21-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  39. 24-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  40. 26-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  41. 25-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  42. 23-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  43. 20-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  44. 16-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  45. 12-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  46. 02-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  47. 06-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  48. 21-Dec-2022

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  49. 18-Nov-2022

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  50. 04-Oct-2022

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  51. 29-Aug-2022

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  52. 08-Jul-2022

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  53. 07-Jun-2022

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  54. 04-May-2022

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  55. 12-Apr-2022

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  56. 17-Mar-2022

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  57. 31-Jan-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  58. 03-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  59. 16-Nov-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  60. 16-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge , Senior Division and Addl CJM

  61. 17-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Senior Division Newasa

  62. 16-Jul-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  63. 07-Jun-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  64. 16-Feb-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  65. 16-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  66. 08-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  67. 05-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  68. 02-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  69. 22-Jan-2021

    Appearance

    Senior Division Newasa

  70. 08-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 04-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 19/2021 This case involves a property dispute concerning land in Kukan village. The petitioners (Ashit and Pranav Abhang) challenged respondents' claims over agricultural land (Plot 90/1). The core dispute centered on alleged unauthorized occupation of the disputed property and validity of prior land sales and transfers. The court examined testimony regarding boundaries, previous sale deeds, and construction of structures on adjacent plots. The court found that the respondents' occupation of the property was unlawful and that the petitioners had superior claims to the land. Petition allowed; respondents' encroachment on the disputed property declared invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case