Swati Ramnath Kalhapure vs Vijay Dattatraya Kalhapure — 5/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140000192026

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

20/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swati Ramnath Kalhapure

    Adv. BHUSARI BALASAHEB RAMNATH

  2. 2.Ramnath Bhimraj Kalhapure

    Adv. BHUSARI BALASAHEB RAMNATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Dattatraya Kalhapure

  2. 2.Vandana Vijay Kalhapure

  3. 3.Vitthal Raghunath Kalhapure

  4. 4.Savita Vitthal Kalhapur

  5. 5.Prakash Raghunath Kalhapure

  6. 6.Pushpa Prakash Kalhapure

  7. 7.Revannath Jagannath Dhere

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 5/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's objection to registering the respondents' counterclaim. The court found that both the original suit and counterclaim concern the same agricultural property in Maurje Lohhgaon and related claims, and that CPC Order 8 Rule 6 does not restrict a counterclaim to only original parties. Accordingly, the court ordered the counterclaim to be registered as per procedure. Date: 23.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 5/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's objection to registering the respondents' counterclaim. The court found that both the original suit and counterclaim concern the same agricultural property in Maurje Lohhgaon and related claims, and that CPC Order 8 Rule 6 does not restrict a counterclaim to only original parties. Accordingly, the court ordered the counterclaim to be registered as per procedure. Date: 23.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case