Suresh Fattesinh Sinhmar and 3 other vs Vitthal Rambhau Mote and 6 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D. — 61/2023
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH130009882023
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-10-2023
Filing Number
317/2023
Filing Date
21-10-2023
Registration No
61/2023
Registration Date
21-10-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Fattesinh Sinhmar and 3 other
Adv. Temak B. S.
Pavitra Suresh Sinhmar
Adv. Temak B. S.
Sanjay Vishnu Garje
Adv. Temak B. S.
Sachin Gorkshnath Kale
Adv. Temak B. S.
Respondent(s)
Vitthal Rambhau Mote and 6 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D.
Sunil Vitthal Mote and 6 other
Adv. NIL
Dhananjay Vitthal Mote
Adv. NIL
Subhash Bhausaheb Mote
Adv. NIL
Surekha Subhash Luniya
Adv. NIL
Subhash Bansilal Luniya
Adv. NIL
Harish Subhash Mote
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the respondents (original plaintiffs) time to file their response to the appellants' stay application by January 18, 2024. The court noted that the executing court cannot confirm possession of the encroached 21-acre land until third parties are heard, and directed both sides to present arguments before deciding on the appellants' request to stay the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the respondents (original plaintiffs) time to file their response to the appellants' stay application by January 18, 2024. The court noted that the executing court cannot confirm possession of the encroached 21-acre land until third parties are heard, and directed both sides to present arguments before deciding on the appellants' request to stay the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts