Suresh Fattesinh Sinhmar and 3 other vs Vitthal Rambhau Mote and 6 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D. — 61/2023
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH130009882023
e-Filing Number
21-10-2023
Filing Number
317/2023
Filing Date
21-Oct-2023
Registration No
61/2023
Registration Date
21-Oct-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suresh Fattesinh Sinhmar and 3 other
Adv. Temak B. S.
-
2.Pavitra Suresh Sinhmar
Adv. Temak B. S.
-
3.Sanjay Vishnu Garje
Adv. Temak B. S.
-
4.Sachin Gorkshnath Kale
Adv. Temak B. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vitthal Rambhau Mote and 6 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D.
-
2.Sunil Vitthal Mote and 6 other
Adv. NIL
-
3.Dhananjay Vitthal Mote
Adv. NIL
-
4.Subhash Bhausaheb Mote
Adv. NIL
-
5.Surekha Subhash Luniya
Adv. NIL
-
6.Subhash Bansilal Luniya
Adv. NIL
-
7.Harish Subhash Mote
Adv. NIL
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
24-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
23-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
17-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
27-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
06-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
08-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
22-Jul-2025
Order on Exh
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
08-Jul-2025
Order on Exh
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
21-Apr-2025
Appearance
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
07-Apr-2025
Appearance
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
17-Mar-2025
Appearance
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
27-Jan-2025
Appearance
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
06-Dec-2024
Appearance
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
27-Nov-2024
Appearance
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
19-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
19-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
03-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
26-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
23-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
12-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
01-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
14-Jun-2024
Steps_Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
30-Apr-2024
Steps_Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
28-Mar-2024
Steps_Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
15-Mar-2024
Steps_Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
08-Feb-2024
Steps_Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
18-Jan-2024
Steps_Unready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
02-Jan-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court allowed the respondents (original plaintiffs) time to file their response to the appellants' stay application by January 18, 2024. The court noted that the executing court cannot confirm possession of the encroached 21-acre land until third parties are heard, and directed both sides to present arguments before deciding on the appellants' request to stay the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jan-2024
Reply/Say
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
24-Nov-2023
Awaiting Notice
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
25-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 61/2023
Summary The court allowed the respondents (original plaintiffs) time to file their response to the appellants' stay application by January 18, 2024. The court noted that the executing court cannot confirm possession of the encroached 21-acre land until third parties are heard, and directed both sides to present arguments before deciding on the appellants' request to stay the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts