Shri Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-Op. Society Ltd. Through Sandip Namdev Dhanwade vs Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap and 3 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D. — 27/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Paper Book. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Paper Book Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHAH130006732022

Filing Number

242/2022

Filing Date

24-Aug-2022

Registration No

27/2022

Registration Date

24-Aug-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court, Newasa.

Judge

1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-Op. Society Ltd. Through Sandip Namdev Dhanwade

    Adv. Jadhav D. M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap and 3 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D.

  2. 2.Madanlal Totaram Gujar(Legal Heir)

    Adv. NIL2.

  3. 3.Kavita Madanlal Gujar

    Adv. NIL2.

  4. 4.Rupali Madnlal Gujar

    Adv. NIL2.

  5. 5.Priyanka Madanlal Gujar Through Minor Gurdian Kavita Madanlal Gujar

    Adv. NIL

  6. 6.Balasaheb Bajirao Chaudhari

    Adv. NIL

  7. 7.Swami Samrtha Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahkari Patsanstha Ltd. Served on Branch Manager

    Adv. NIL

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Paper Book

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-op. Society Ltd. v. Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap (RCA No.27/2022) The District Judge rejected three applications (Exhs.5, 39 & 44) filed by the plaintiff seeking to restrain defendants from constructing on or alienating the disputed land during pendency of the appeal. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the transaction was a loan agreement rather than an agreement to sell, noting that the plaintiff's own legal advisor had warned against advancing funds on the encumbered property and that obtaining guarantors is typical of loan transactions. Since the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for specific performance, it was not entitled to injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  13. 27-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  17. 31-Jul-2025

    A. D. R.

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  19. 29-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  20. 05-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  21. 04-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  22. 13-Jan-2025

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  23. 07-Nov-2024

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  24. 19-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  25. 02-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  26. 20-Jun-2024

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  27. 10-Apr-2024

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  28. 29-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  29. 23-Jan-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  30. 24-Nov-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  31. 29-Sep-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  32. 05-Aug-2023

    Steps_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  33. 17-Jun-2023

    Steps_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  34. 12-Apr-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  35. 03-Mar-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  36. 17-Jan-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  37. 01-Dec-2022

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  38. 18-Oct-2022

    Notice_Unready

    Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

  39. 29-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 24-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-op. Society Ltd. v. Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap (RCA No.27/2022) The District Judge rejected three applications (Exhs.5, 39 & 44) filed by the plaintiff seeking to restrain defendants from constructing on or alienating the disputed land during pendency of the appeal. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the transaction was a loan agreement rather than an agreement to sell, noting that the plaintiff's own legal advisor had warned against advancing funds on the encumbered property and that obtaining guarantors is typical of loan transactions. Since the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for specific performance, it was not entitled to injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case