Shri Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-Op. Society Ltd. Through Sandip Namdev Dhanwade vs Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap and 3 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D. — 27/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Status: Paper Book. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH130006732022
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
242/2022
Filing Date
24-08-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
24-08-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-Op. Society Ltd. Through Sandip Namdev Dhanwade
Adv. Jadhav D. M.
Respondent(s)
Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap and 3 other Advocate - Khildkar R. D.
Madanlal Totaram Gujar(Legal Heir)
Adv. NIL2.
Kavita Madanlal Gujar
Adv. NIL2.
Rupali Madnlal Gujar
Adv. NIL2.
Priyanka Madanlal Gujar Through Minor Gurdian Kavita Madanlal Gujar
Adv. NIL
Balasaheb Bajirao Chaudhari
Adv. NIL
Swami Samrtha Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahkari Patsanstha Ltd. Served on Branch Manager
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Paper Book
Steps
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Paper Book | |
| 11-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 05-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 24-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-op. Society Ltd. v. Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap (RCA No.27/2022) The District Judge rejected three applications (Exhs.5, 39 & 44) filed by the plaintiff seeking to restrain defendants from constructing on or alienating the disputed land during pendency of the appeal. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the transaction was a loan agreement rather than an agreement to sell, noting that the plaintiff's own legal advisor had warned against advancing funds on the encumbered property and that obtaining guarantors is typical of loan transactions. Since the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for specific performance, it was not entitled to injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Sant Nagebaba Multi State Urban Co-op. Society Ltd. v. Renukadas Laxmanrao Gholap (RCA No.27/2022) The District Judge rejected three applications (Exhs.5, 39 & 44) filed by the plaintiff seeking to restrain defendants from constructing on or alienating the disputed land during pendency of the appeal. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the transaction was a loan agreement rather than an agreement to sell, noting that the plaintiff's own legal advisor had warned against advancing funds on the encumbered property and that obtaining guarantors is typical of loan transactions. Since the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for specific performance, it was not entitled to injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts