Somnath Mohan Navale vs Jalindar Mohan Navale and 3 other Advocate - Deshmukh D. B. — 42/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH130006172016
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
240/2016
Filing Date
29-08-2016
Registration No
42/2016
Registration Date
29-08-2016
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Somnath Mohan Navale
Adv. Joshi N. S.
Respondent(s)
Jalindar Mohan Navale and 3 other Advocate - Deshmukh D. B.
Mohan Shankar Navale
Bhimabai Mohan Navale
Shobhatai Uttam Ghule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Awaiting Notice
Steps
Paper Book
Paper Book
Paper Book
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 27-02-2026 | Paper Book | |
| 07-02-2026 | Paper Book | |
| 29-01-2026 | Paper Book |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCA No.42/2016 (Somnath Mohan Navale v. Jalindarr Mohan Navale), the District Court rejected Application Exh.20 on 25.11.2025. The application to bring Legal Representatives of Respondent No.1 was filed after a delay of 2 years 9 months, which the court had conditionally condoned on 10.10.2024 subject to cost payment. However, the appellant failed to deposit the cost within the stipulated time and moved the application again after 9 months without justification, demonstrating negligence and intent to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCA No.42/2016 (Somnath Mohan Navale v. Jalindarr Mohan Navale), the District Court rejected Application Exh.20 on 25.11.2025. The application to bring Legal Representatives of Respondent No.1 was filed after a delay of 2 years 9 months, which the court had conditionally condoned on 10.10.2024 subject to cost payment. However, the appellant failed to deposit the cost within the stipulated time and moved the application again after 9 months without justification, demonstrating negligence and intent to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts