The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station vs Ansar Babamember @ Abdulnabi and 13 other Advocate - Shiledar S. K. — 57/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,504,506,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAH130006122022
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
407/2022
Filing Date
02-08-2022
Registration No
57/2022
Registration Date
02-08-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
FIR Details
FIR Number
262
Police Station
Newasa Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station
Adv. Kale M. S
Respondent(s)
Ansar Babamember @ Abdulnabi and 13 other Advocate - Shiledar S. K.
Shaikh Mukthar Babamember
Adv. Shiledar S. K.
Abdulnabi Shaikh Munna @ Aasif Mahamod Shaikh
Adv. Kardak A. G.
Faijan Muktar Shaikh
Adv. Shiledar S. K.
Rafid Babamember @ Abdulnabi Shaikh
Adv. Kardak A. G.
Mamu Babamember @ Abdulnabi Shaikh
Sahil Rafik Shaikh
Adv. Kardak A. G.
Altaf Imamkhan Pathan
Adv. Pathan M. I.
Ajim Altaf Pathan
Adv. Pathan A. R.
Faijal Salim Shaikh
Adv. Pathan M. I.
Maujim Altaf Pathan
Adv. Pathan M. I.
Sadik Imamkhan Pathan
Adv. Pathan M. I.
Salim Ahmadkhan Pathan
Adv. Pathan M. I.
Asifkhan Ahmedkhan Pathan
Adv. Pathan M. I.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 28-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application of accused Ajij Altaf Pathan to renew his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Indian Passport Act, despite pending criminal charges under IPC sections 353, 332, 504, 506, and Maharashtra Police Act sections 37(1)(3)/135. However, the court clarified that no-objection to passport renewal does not mandate issuance by authorities, and the accused must seek prior court permission for each foreign travel and cannot misuse the passport to flee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application of accused Ajij Altaf Pathan to renew his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Indian Passport Act, despite pending criminal charges under IPC sections 353, 332, 504, 506, and Maharashtra Police Act sections 37(1)(3)/135. However, the court clarified that no-objection to passport renewal does not mandate issuance by authorities, and the accused must seek prior court permission for each foreign travel and cannot misuse the passport to flee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts