Nitin Dashrath Mungaase vs Shital Nitin Mungase Advocate - Temak B. S. — 26/2023

Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 11(2). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH130003572023

Hearing

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2023

Filing Number

139/2023

Filing Date

06-05-2023

Registration No

26/2023

Registration Date

09-05-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court, Newasa.

Judge

3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

Acts & Sections

HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

Nitin Dashrath Mungaase

Adv. Lawande S. B.

Respondent(s)

Shital Nitin Mungase Advocate - Temak B. S.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

23-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

31-01-2026

Hearing

16-12-2025

Hearing

09-12-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

09-10-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The District Court rejected the father's interim application seeking weekly visiting rights with his 3-year-old son. Although the father had already obtained similar visiting rights from the Magistrate Court (with a condition to deposit Rs.1,000 per visit), he failed to comply with that order and instead filed this application four months later. The court held that the father cannot obtain the same relief from another court using different legal provisions without first executing the existing court order, and rejected the application without prejudice to the main custody petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court rejected the father's interim application seeking weekly visiting rights with his 3-year-old son. Although the father had already obtained similar visiting rights from the Magistrate Court (with a condition to deposit Rs.1,000 per visit), he failed to comply with that order and instead filed this application four months later. The court held that the father cannot obtain the same relief from another court using different legal provisions without first executing the existing court order, and rejected the application without prejudice to the main custody petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Newasa. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case