Sumit Lajaras Kharat vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station Advocate - APP — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL CANCELLED on 30th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001642026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
108/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL CANCELLED
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
Newasa Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sumit Lajaras Kharat
Adv. Shinde Tushar K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court rejected Sumit Lajras Kharat's anticipatory bail application in a case involving the suicide of Sachin Chandane. The court found that allegations of abetment—including phone calls, taunts, threats, and sharing obscene photos—constitute serious offences under Section 108 BNS requiring custodial interrogation, and granting anticipatory bail could frustrate the investigation and allow witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
25-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
18-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
12-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2026
The court rejected Sumit Lajras Kharat's anticipatory bail application in a case involving the suicide of Sachin Chandane. The court found that allegations of abetment—including phone calls, taunts, threats, and sharing obscene photos—constitute serious offences under Section 108 BNS requiring custodial interrogation, and granting anticipatory bail could frustrate the investigation and allow witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts