Sumit Lajaras Kharat vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station Advocate - APP — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL CANCELLED on 30th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001642026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
108/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL CANCELLED
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
Newasa Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sumit Lajaras Kharat
Adv. Shinde Tushar K.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected Sumit Lajras Kharat's anticipatory bail application in a case involving the suicide of Sachin Chandane. The court found that allegations of abetment—including phone calls, taunts, threats, and sharing obscene photos—constitute serious offences under Section 108 BNS requiring custodial interrogation, and granting anticipatory bail could frustrate the investigation and allow witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected Sumit Lajras Kharat's anticipatory bail application in a case involving the suicide of Sachin Chandane. The court found that allegations of abetment—including phone calls, taunts, threats, and sharing obscene photos—constitute serious offences under Section 108 BNS requiring custodial interrogation, and granting anticipatory bail could frustrate the investigation and allow witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts