Deva Alias Devidas Subhash Dhanawade vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station Advocate - APP — 63/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001522026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
97/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
Newasa Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Deva Alias Devidas Subhash Dhanawade
Adv. Ghawate L. D.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Disposed
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted regular bail to accused Deva @ Devidas Subhash Dhanwade under Section 483 BNSS in Crime No. 36/2026 (Newasa Police Station) for assaulting revenue staff members during an illegal mineral transport operation. The court found that since both vehicles had been seized, there was no risk of evidence tampering, and the accused being an agriculturist with permanent residence posed no flight risk. The bail was set at Rs. 50,000 (personal bond and surety) with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted regular bail to accused Deva @ Devidas Subhash Dhanwade under Section 483 BNSS in Crime No. 36/2026 (Newasa Police Station) for assaulting revenue staff members during an illegal mineral transport operation. The court found that since both vehicles had been seized, there was no risk of evidence tampering, and the accused being an agriculturist with permanent residence posed no flight risk. The bail was set at Rs. 50,000 (personal bond and surety) with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts