Ravindra Babasaheb Gayke vs The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP — 57/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001302026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
Sonai Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Babasaheb Gayke
Adv. Salve Akshay S.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Ravindra Babasaheb Gayke in a case involving allegations of assault and harassment, considering the considerable delay in lodging the FIR, evidence of the accused's presence elsewhere on the incident date (via a cash memo), his permanent residence, and an existing civil dispute between the parties. The accused was released on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including non-tampering of evidence, non-contact with witnesses, and periodic police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Ravindra Babasaheb Gayke in a case involving allegations of assault and harassment, considering the considerable delay in lodging the FIR, evidence of the accused's presence elsewhere on the incident date (via a cash memo), his permanent residence, and an existing civil dispute between the parties. The accused was released on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including non-tampering of evidence, non-contact with witnesses, and periodic police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts