Bandu Alias Ram Namdeo Darandale vs The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001232026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
Sonai Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bandu Alias Ram Namdeo Darandale
Adv. Sonawane Swapnil S.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Disposed
Arguments
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 26-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Bandu @ Ram Namdev Darandale in a case involving criminal threats, assault, and indecent exposure against a 58-year-old woman and her husband. The judge found that the accused's custodial presence was unnecessary, he had permanent residence, posed no flight risk, and counter-complaints existed; bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, no witness intimidation, and mandatory police station appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Bandu @ Ram Namdev Darandale in a case involving criminal threats, assault, and indecent exposure against a 58-year-old woman and her husband. The judge found that the accused's custodial presence was unnecessary, he had permanent residence, posed no flight risk, and counter-complaints existed; bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, no witness intimidation, and mandatory police station appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts