Bandu Alias Ram Namdeo Darandale vs The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP — 54/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHAH130001232026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Newasa.

Judge

3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

Sonai Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Bandu Alias Ram Namdeo Darandale

Adv. Sonawane Swapnil S.

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa

09-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Arguments

26-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Bandu @ Ram Namdev Darandale in a case involving criminal threats, assault, and indecent exposure against a 58-year-old woman and her husband. The judge found that the accused's custodial presence was unnecessary, he had permanent residence, posed no flight risk, and counter-complaints existed; bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, no witness intimidation, and mandatory police station appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Bandu @ Ram Namdev Darandale in a case involving criminal threats, assault, and indecent exposure against a 58-year-old woman and her husband. The judge found that the accused's custodial presence was unnecessary, he had permanent residence, posed no flight risk, and counter-complaints existed; bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, no witness intimidation, and mandatory police station appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Newasa. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case