Bandu Alias Ram Namdeo Darandale vs The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001232026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
Sonai Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bandu Alias Ram Namdeo Darandale
Adv. Sonawane Swapnil S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Bandu @ Ram Namdev Darandale in a case involving criminal threats, assault, and indecent exposure against a 58-year-old woman and her husband. The judge found that the accused's custodial presence was unnecessary, he had permanent residence, posed no flight risk, and counter-complaints existed; bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, no witness intimidation, and mandatory police station appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Bandu @ Ram Namdev Darandale in a case involving criminal threats, assault, and indecent exposure against a 58-year-old woman and her husband. The judge found that the accused's custodial presence was unnecessary, he had permanent residence, posed no flight risk, and counter-complaints existed; bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, no witness intimidation, and mandatory police station appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts