Rajendra Alias Raju Sudhakar Jagtap vs The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP — 47/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH130001112026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
71/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
438
Police Station
Sonai Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Alias Raju Sudhakar Jagtap
Adv. Nahar P. C.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra, Through Assistant Police Inspector of Sonai Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted regular bail to accused Rajendra @ Raju Sudhakar Jagtap in a case involving vehicle damage and threats under BNS 2023 and SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The accused was released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, as the court found that further detention was unnecessary given the nature of the offences. Standard bail conditions prohibiting witness contact and evidence tampering were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted regular bail to accused Rajendra @ Raju Sudhakar Jagtap in a case involving vehicle damage and threats under BNS 2023 and SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The accused was released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, as the court found that further detention was unnecessary given the nature of the offences. Standard bail conditions prohibiting witness contact and evidence tampering were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts