Ganesh Ramesh Jare and 1 other vs Ujwala Surendra Hapse and 7 other Advocate - Joshi N. S. — 3/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH130001022024
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2024
Filing Number
38/2024
Filing Date
13-02-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
13-02-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Ramesh Jare and 1 other
Adv. Garad B. S.
Ushabai Namdeo Jare
Adv. BHUSARI BALASAHEB RAMNATH
Respondent(s)
Ujwala Surendra Hapse and 7 other Advocate - Joshi N. S.
Vishnu Rajaram Jare
Adv. NIL
Rangubai Vishnu Jare
Adv. NIL
Gangubai Gokuldas Wagh
Adv. NIL
Mangal Suresh Mohade
Adv. NIL
Jijabai Babasaheb Nalkar
Adv. NIL
Jalindar Vishnu Jare
Adv. NIL
Subhash Misrilal Chordiya
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 19-12-2025 | Arguments | |
| 18-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The application filed by Respondent No. 8 (Subhash Chordiya) for transposition as Appellant No. 3 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 3/2024 has been rejected. The District Judge held that since Defendant No. 7 was already a party to the original suit and filed a written statement, there was no mistake requiring transposition, and he can participate in the appeal without being formally transposed as an appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The application filed by Respondent No. 8 (Subhash Chordiya) for transposition as Appellant No. 3 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 3/2024 has been rejected. The District Judge held that since Defendant No. 7 was already a party to the original suit and filed a written statement, there was no mistake requiring transposition, and he can participate in the appeal without being formally transposed as an appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts