The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station vs Sachin Bhagchand Rathode Advocate - NIL — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64(m), 65(1),238(kh)(b). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHAH130000972026
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
61/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
FIR Details
FIR Number
477
Police Station
Newasa Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sachin Bhagchand Rathode Advocate - NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 18-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 16-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 09-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 07-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Bail granted to accused Sachin Bhagchand Rathod in Special Case No. 13/2026 (kidnapping and sexual assault of a 14-year-old victim). The court released him on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, considering his age (21 years) and that chargesheet has been filed. The case is scheduled for charge framing on 16.03.2026, with conditions that he not tamper evidence, attend court regularly, and not seek adjournments without valid reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: Bail granted to accused Sachin Bhagchand Rathod in Special Case No. 13/2026 (kidnapping and sexual assault of a 14-year-old victim). The court released him on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, considering his age (21 years) and that chargesheet has been filed. The case is scheduled for charge framing on 16.03.2026, with conditions that he not tamper evidence, attend court regularly, and not seek adjournments without valid reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts