The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station vs Jojeph @ Jojeb Satyadan Hiwale Advocate - Bhusari B. R. — 36/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHAH130000732025
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
11-06-2024
Filing Number
60/2025
Filing Date
22-01-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Newasa.
Judge
1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
FIR Details
FIR Number
971
Police Station
Newasa Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector of Newasa Police Station
Adv. Kale M. S
Respondent(s)
Jojeph @ Jojeb Satyadan Hiwale Advocate - Bhusari B. R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Newasa
Awaiting Muddemal
Evidence
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 14-01-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 08-12-2025 | List of Witness | |
| 17-11-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Special Court (POCSO), Newasa, issued formal charges against Jojef @ Jojeb Satyadan Hiwale (age 25) for offences under Section 354-A IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012, for allegedly showing vulgar videos to and inappropriately touching a 13-year-old victim on 01.10.2023. The court directed that the accused be tried by the Court of Sessions for the aforementioned charges, and the charges were read and explained to the accused in the vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Court (POCSO), Newasa, issued formal charges against Jojef @ Jojeb Satyadan Hiwale (age 25) for offences under Section 354-A IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012, for allegedly showing vulgar videos to and inappropriately touching a 13-year-old victim on 01.10.2023. The court directed that the accused be tried by the Court of Sessions for the aforementioned charges, and the charges were read and explained to the accused in the vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts