Shitaram Balwanta Khemnar vs Bhausaheb Karbhari Dolner Advocate - Malpani P. R. — 900075/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH080026612014

Dismissal Order

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

900075/2011

Filing Date

01-02-2011

Registration No

900075/2011

Registration Date

02-02-2011

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner

Judge

7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Shitaram Balwanta Khemnar

Adv. Khatode A. B.

Popat Sitaram Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Devidas Sitaram Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Respondent(s)

Bhausaheb Karbhari Dolner Advocate - Malpani P. R.

Nanda Bhausaheb Dolner

Adv. NIL

Mangal Balasaheb Dolner

Adv. NIL

Manisha Ashok Dolner

Adv. NIL

Ashok Karbhari Dolner

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM

24-03-2026

Dismissal Order

09-03-2026

Dismissal Order

21-02-2026

Dismissal Order

27-01-2026

Dismissal Order

24-12-2025

Dismissal Order

Interim Orders

13-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The defendants' application challenging the Court Commissioner's report regarding land demarcation (Gat No. 31) was rejected. The court held that the Court Commissioner's report is valid evidence and any alleged deficiencies must be established through cogent evidence during trial, not by mere assertion. Both parties are directed to expedite trial proceedings and present their evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendants' application challenging the Court Commissioner's report regarding land demarcation (Gat No. 31) was rejected. The court held that the Court Commissioner's report is valid evidence and any alleged deficiencies must be established through cogent evidence during trial, not by mere assertion. Both parties are directed to expedite trial proceedings and present their evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case