Vitthalrao Kisanrao Sonawane vs Satyabhama Ashok Sonawane Advocate - Mendre G. R. — 1106/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Hearing Without W.S. Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH080023772023

e-Filing Number

11-12-2023

Filing Number

2109/2023

Filing Date

12-Dec-2023

Registration No

1106/2023

Registration Date

13-Dec-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner

Judge

8-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vitthalrao Kisanrao Sonawane

    Adv. Aher Sudhrshan J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Satyabhama Ashok Sonawane Advocate - Mendre G. R.

  2. 2.Kondyabai Manik Sonawane

    Adv. Mendre G. R.

  3. 3.Ganesh Ashok Sonawane

    Adv. Mendre G. R.

  4. 4.Rajendra Manik Sonawane

    Adv. Mendre G. R.

  5. 5.Dattatray Manik Sonawane

    Adv. Mendre G. R.

  6. 6.Balu Manik Sonawane

    Adv. Mendre G. R.

  7. 7.Suresh Kisanrao Sonawane

    Adv. NIL

  8. 8.Arun Kisanrao Sonawane

    Adv. NIL

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 18-Aug-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 16-Jun-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 03-Mar-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 06-Jan-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 18-Oct-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 31-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 31-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 10-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 10-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 09-May-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 18-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 11-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 02-Mar-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application (petition no. 5) in Civil Suit No. 1106/2023. The court found that the plaintiff has established prima facie ownership and possession of the disputed property and that defendants 1-6 have no legal right to obstruct the plaintiff's ownership. The court directed that defendants shall not create any encumbrances on the property pending final judgment, cautioning them against causing irreparable harm to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 02-Mar-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 28-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  22. 20-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  23. 14-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  24. 30-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  25. 16-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  26. 02-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  27. 15-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 12-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1106/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application (petition no. 5) in Civil Suit No. 1106/2023. The court found that the plaintiff has established prima facie ownership and possession of the disputed property and that defendants 1-6 have no legal right to obstruct the plaintiff's ownership. The court directed that defendants shall not create any encumbrances on the property pending final judgment, cautioning them against causing irreparable harm to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case