Vitthalrao Kisanrao Sonawane vs Satyabhama Ashok Sonawane Advocate - Mendre G. R. — 1106/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080023772023
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-12-2023
Filing Number
2109/2023
Filing Date
12-12-2023
Registration No
1106/2023
Registration Date
13-12-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
8-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vitthalrao Kisanrao Sonawane
Adv. Aher Sudhrshan J.
Respondent(s)
Satyabhama Ashok Sonawane Advocate - Mendre G. R.
Kondyabai Manik Sonawane
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Ganesh Ashok Sonawane
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Rajendra Manik Sonawane
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Dattatray Manik Sonawane
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Balu Manik Sonawane
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Suresh Kisanrao Sonawane
Adv. NIL
Arun Kisanrao Sonawane
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 30-01-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 28-11-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 10-10-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 18-08-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application (petition no. 5) in Civil Suit No. 1106/2023. The court found that the plaintiff has established prima facie ownership and possession of the disputed property and that defendants 1-6 have no legal right to obstruct the plaintiff's ownership. The court directed that defendants shall not create any encumbrances on the property pending final judgment, cautioning them against causing irreparable harm to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application (petition no. 5) in Civil Suit No. 1106/2023. The court found that the plaintiff has established prima facie ownership and possession of the disputed property and that defendants 1-6 have no legal right to obstruct the plaintiff's ownership. The court directed that defendants shall not create any encumbrances on the property pending final judgment, cautioning them against causing irreparable harm to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts