Vishwnath Shankar Shelke vs Subhash Shankar Shelke Advocate - Argade P. S. — 1123/2021
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080022712021
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1958/2021
Filing Date
23-12-2021
Registration No
1123/2021
Registration Date
24-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
8-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishwnath Shankar Shelke
Adv. Shinde A. V.
Respondent(s)
Subhash Shankar Shelke Advocate - Argade P. S.
Bhimraj Shankar Shelke
Adv. Shivurkar Nishatai
Bastiram Shankar Shelke
Adv. Shivurkar Nishatai
Indira Alias Agnesh Dnyandeo Sagalgile
Adv. Shivurkar Nishatai
Lata Karbhari Bhosale
Adv. Shivurkar Nishatai
Manda Vijay Thorat
Adv. Shivurkar Nishatai
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 07-02-2026 | Compliance | |
| 03-01-2026 | Compliance | |
| 16-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 19-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
The petition for arm and affidavit was refused, and the discharge reveled. The court preferred to apply both Section 17-A for setting aside notice and order, holding that the said affidavit is not signed by him. Considering the reason for permission to sign the affidavit under Section 17-A, the court granted prejudice would cause to any aggrieved party, such person is allowed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition for arm and affidavit was refused, and the discharge reveled. The court preferred to apply both Section 17-A for setting aside notice and order, holding that the said affidavit is not signed by him. Considering the reason for permission to sign the affidavit under Section 17-A, the court granted prejudice would cause to any aggrieved party, such person is allowed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts