Bhaskar Ranganath Kasar vs Ramnath Shivnath Dongare Advocate - Bodhak Atul B. — 1004/2019

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH080018102019

Filing Number

1646/2019

Filing Date

03-Sep-2019

Registration No

1004/2019

Registration Date

04-Sep-2019

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner

Judge

9-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhaskar Ranganath Kasar

    Adv. Malpani P. R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramnath Shivnath Dongare Advocate - Bodhak Atul B.

  2. 2.Santosh Ramnath Dongare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary In Civil Suit No. 1004/2019, the First Class Magistrate (Court No. 2), Sangamner, examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving a well (vihir) and land division among family members. The court found the witness's testimony regarding Survey No. 14/3 and the well's location to be inconsistent and unreliable, noting contradictions in the statements about Survey No. 15/5 and property demarcation. The judgment was delivered on 03/12/2025, with the court recording its findings based on the cross-examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  15. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  16. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  18. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  19. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  20. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  22. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  23. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  24. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  25. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  26. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  27. 27-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  28. 17-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  29. 05-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  30. 16-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  31. 19-Apr-2024

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  32. 28-Feb-2024

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  33. 11-Jan-2024

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  34. 26-Oct-2023

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  35. 30-Aug-2023

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  36. 28-Jun-2023

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  37. 13-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  38. 10-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  39. 24-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  40. 23-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  41. 16-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  42. 28-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  43. 10-Oct-2022

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  44. 18-Jul-2022

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  45. 29-Apr-2022

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  46. 17-Mar-2022

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  47. 20-Jan-2022

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  48. 23-Nov-2021

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  49. 05-Aug-2021

    No W.S. Order

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  50. 06-Apr-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  51. 09-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  52. 17-Oct-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  53. 17-Aug-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  54. 25-Jun-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  55. 22-Apr-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  56. 28-Feb-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  57. 28-Jan-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  58. 16-Nov-2019

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division

  59. 07-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 03-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1004/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Suit No. 1004/2019, the First Class Magistrate (Court No. 2), Sangamner, examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving a well (vihir) and land division among family members. The court found the witness's testimony regarding Survey No. 14/3 and the well's location to be inconsistent and unreliable, noting contradictions in the statements about Survey No. 15/5 and property demarcation. The judgment was delivered on 03/12/2025, with the court recording its findings based on the cross-examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case