Sukdeo Shankar Jorvekar vs Kacharu Laxman Jorvekar Advocate - Ganpule A. D. — 886/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Summons_Ready. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080016752020
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1504/2020
Filing Date
21-12-2020
Registration No
886/2020
Registration Date
22-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sukdeo Shankar Jorvekar
Adv. Rokade S. K.
Suman Shankar Jorvekar
Adv. Rokade K. G.
Respondent(s)
Kacharu Laxman Jorvekar Advocate - Ganpule A. D.
Gangadhar Mahadu Chatar
Adv. NIL
Deoram Vishram Chatar
Adv. NIL
Vishwas Babanrao Chatar
Adv. NIL
Ramnath Vishram Chatar
Adv. NIL
Bhausheb Vishram Chatar
Adv. NIL
Ramkrushna Gavaliram Gaikwad
Adv. NIL
Dilip Vishram Chatar
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division
Summons_Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Amended Plaint
Compliance
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Summons_Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 10-02-2026 | Amended Plaint | |
| 28-01-2026 | Compliance | |
| 07-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Sukdev vs. Kacharu (R.C.S. No. 886/2020) Order: The application for amendment of the plaint is ALLOWED. The court permitted the plaintiffs to amend their pleading to implead additional necessary parties (legal representatives of the deceased defendant and other stakeholders), correct property descriptions (area and boundaries of suit properties), and include an additional sale-deed executed in 2007. Plaintiffs were directed to complete these amendments within 14 days, with both parties retaining the right to raise limitation defenses during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Sukdev vs. Kacharu (R.C.S. No. 886/2020) Order: The application for amendment of the plaint is ALLOWED. The court permitted the plaintiffs to amend their pleading to implead additional necessary parties (legal representatives of the deceased defendant and other stakeholders), correct property descriptions (area and boundaries of suit properties), and include an additional sale-deed executed in 2007. Plaintiffs were directed to complete these amendments within 14 days, with both parties retaining the right to raise limitation defenses during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts