Mahadu Gangadhar Parvat vs Somnath Gangadhar Parvat — 730/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH080015682025

e-Filing Number

08-09-2025

Filing Number

1576/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

730/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner

Judge

1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadu Gangadhar Parvat

    Adv. Lohale Ajay Babasaheb

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Somnath Gangadhar Parvat

  2. 2.Punja Gangadhar Parvat

  3. 3.Balasaheb Gangadhar Parvat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the petition and decided the suit on merits to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. The court ordered that the defendant be given an opportunity to file a written statement in response to the claim, and directed that defendants are permitted to file their written statements subject to costs, with the court ordering the books be given to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing Without W.S.

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  10. 13-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 730/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition and decided the suit on merits to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. The court ordered that the defendant be given an opportunity to file a written statement in response to the claim, and directed that defendants are permitted to file their written statements subject to costs, with the court ordering the books be given to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case