Baban Appaji Khemnar vs Rabhaji Bhaga Khemnar Advocate - Darole K. D. — 409/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH080009082022

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

832/2022

Filing Date

26-04-2022

Registration No

409/2022

Registration Date

27-04-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner

Judge

1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Baban Appaji Khemnar

Adv. Shejul R. M.

Lahanu Appaji Khemnar

Adv. Shejul R. M.

Sujata Uttam Khemnar

Adv. Shejul R. M.

Respondent(s)

Rabhaji Bhaga Khemnar Advocate - Darole K. D.

Changdeo Bhagaji Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Pramila Bhagaji Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Manisha Suresh Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Vaibhav Suresh Khemnar Through Manisha Suresh Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Malhar Suresh Khemnar Through Manisha Suresh Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Mandakini Vithoba Khemnar

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division

06-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

29-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

18-09-2025
Issues
10-12-2025
Evidence
29-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

CASE OUTCOME SUMMARY The application is allowed. The no-cross order previously passed against Defendant No. 01 regarding Plaintiff's Witness No. 1 is set-aside, and Defendant No. 01 is permitted to cross-examine Plaintiff's Witness No. 1. However, Defendant No. 01 must pay Rs. 300 as cost to the Plaintiff as a condition precedent to exercising this right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE OUTCOME SUMMARY The application is allowed. The no-cross order previously passed against Defendant No. 01 regarding Plaintiff's Witness No. 1 is set-aside, and Defendant No. 01 is permitted to cross-examine Plaintiff's Witness No. 1. However, Defendant No. 01 must pay Rs. 300 as cost to the Plaintiff as a condition precedent to exercising this right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case