Tatyasaheb Bhagwat Joshi vs Sakhubai Pavlas Lohale Advocate - Ganpule A. D. — 245/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,35,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080005252022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
487/2022
Filing Date
08-03-2022
Registration No
245/2022
Registration Date
09-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tatyasaheb Bhagwat Joshi
Adv. Hase Y. B.
Suresh Bhagwat Joshi
Adv. Hase Y. B.
Balasaheb Bhagwat Joshi
Adv. Hase Y. B.
Ashok Bhagwat Joshi
Adv. Hase Y. B.
Respondent(s)
Sakhubai Pavlas Lohale Advocate - Ganpule A. D.
Lahanu Pavlas Lohale
Adv. NIL
Hiraman Pavlas Lohale
Adv. NIL
Yuvraj Pavlas Lohale
Adv. NIL
Ranjana Ramesh Kasabe
Adv. NIL
Satish Jon Lohale
Adv. NIL
Kiran Jagnnath Dhamak
Adv. NIL
Bhagirathi Jagannath Dhamak
Adv. NIL
Shubhangi Arun Kadam
Adv. NIL
Anna Mahadu Lohale
Adv. NIL
Kamini Gaurav Ahire
Adv. NIL
Maya Prakash Lohale
Adv. NIL
Vaibhav Prakash Lohale
Adv. NIL
Shalubai Karbhari Donde
Adv. NIL
Bhaskar Mahadu Lohale
Adv. NIL
Pushpa Uttam Dive
Adv. NIL
Minakshi Dattatray Bhosale
Adv. NIL
Nanasaheb Mahadu Lohale
Adv. NIL
Jyoti Raosaheb Borde
Adv. NIL
Laxman Chandrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Sarjerao Chandrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Sagunabai Chandrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Sindhubai Indrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Satish Indrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Dipak Indrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Vilas Indrabhan Lohale
Adv. NIL
Sarjerao Baburao Pawade
Adv. NIL
Dilip Baburao Pawade
Adv. NIL
Tukaram Chima Khemnar
Adv. NIL
The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Ahmednagar
Adv. NIL
Bhumi Abhilekh Saheb Sangamner
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 11-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The application filed by defendants No. 2, 3, 10, 15, 18, 27, and 28 to set aside the "without written statement" and "ex-parte" orders was allowed. The court permitted the defendants to submit written statements in response to the plaint regarding the disputed agricultural properties in Chanegaon, Ahmednagar, despite a delay of approximately 2 years and 9 months, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 2,000 to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The application filed by defendants No. 2, 3, 10, 15, 18, 27, and 28 to set aside the "without written statement" and "ex-parte" orders was allowed. The court permitted the defendants to submit written statements in response to the plaint regarding the disputed agricultural properties in Chanegaon, Ahmednagar, despite a delay of approximately 2 years and 9 months, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 2,000 to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts