Dnyandev Mahadu Bhujbal vs Janardan Mahadu Bhujbal — 149/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080002862023
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2023
Filing Number
287/2023
Filing Date
16-02-2023
Registration No
149/2023
Registration Date
17-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
6-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyandev Mahadu Bhujbal
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Respondent(s)
Janardan Mahadu Bhujbal
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 20-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 05-02-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 15-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by a 77-year-old petitioner has been allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner's younger brother (Grandson in Marathi - Mulauga Nutun Gyandevey Bhujabal) shall file an affidavit of undertaking (surety bond) with the competent government authority within a specified timeframe. The petitioner's medical certificate from Dr. Ashok Sonbidkar, dated 22/11/2023, confirmed age-related hearing and vision limitations (45-105 decibels and 45-115 decibels respectively), justifying the court's favorable disposition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by a 77-year-old petitioner has been allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner's younger brother (Grandson in Marathi - Mulauga Nutun Gyandevey Bhujabal) shall file an affidavit of undertaking (surety bond) with the competent government authority within a specified timeframe. The petitioner's medical certificate from Dr. Ashok Sonbidkar, dated 22/11/2023, confirmed age-related hearing and vision limitations (45-105 decibels and 45-115 decibels respectively), justifying the court's favorable disposition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts