Dnyandev Mahadu Bhujbal vs Janardan Mahadu Bhujbal — 149/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080002862023
e-Filing Number
16-02-2023
Filing Number
287/2023
Filing Date
16-Feb-2023
Registration No
149/2023
Registration Date
17-Feb-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
6-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dnyandev Mahadu Bhujbal
Adv. Mendre G. R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Janardan Mahadu Bhujbal
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
20-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
05-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
15-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
16-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
10-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
12-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
06-Aug-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
08-May-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
20-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by a 77-year-old petitioner has been allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner's younger brother (Grandson in Marathi - Mulauga Nutun Gyandevey Bhujabal) shall file an affidavit of undertaking (surety bond) with the competent government authority within a specified timeframe. The petitioner's medical certificate from Dr. Ashok Sonbidkar, dated 22/11/2023, confirmed age-related hearing and vision limitations (45-105 decibels and 45-115 decibels respectively), justifying the court's favorable disposition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
26-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
16-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Feb-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
06-Jan-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Nov-2023
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
26-Sep-2023
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
28-Aug-2023
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
25-Jul-2023
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
17-Jun-2023
Evidence
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
20-Apr-2023
Issues
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-Mar-2023
W.S. and Say
5th Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2023
Summary: The petition filed by a 77-year-old petitioner has been allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner's younger brother (Grandson in Marathi - Mulauga Nutun Gyandevey Bhujabal) shall file an affidavit of undertaking (surety bond) with the competent government authority within a specified timeframe. The petitioner's medical certificate from Dr. Ashok Sonbidkar, dated 22/11/2023, confirmed age-related hearing and vision limitations (45-105 decibels and 45-115 decibels respectively), justifying the court's favorable disposition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts