Sidharth Arvind Waghamare vs Sanjay Maruti Kshatriya Advocate - Gunjal V. B. — 800078/2010

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHAH080000242010

Arguments

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

800078/2010

Filing Date

10-12-2010

Registration No

800078/2010

Registration Date

21-12-2010

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner

Judge

7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Sidharth Arvind Waghamare

Adv. Ganpule A. D.

Prakash Ramchandra Waghmare

Adv. Ganpule S. A.

Sunit Arvind Waghmare

Adv. NIL

Respondent(s)

Sanjay Maruti Kshatriya Advocate - Gunjal V. B.

Shrikant Maruti Kshatriy

Adv. NIL

M D.C.M. Shriram Cansolideted Com. Ltd. Through Group Manager Nanakchand Trilokchand Agrawal

Adv. NIL

Chandrabhan Laxminarayan Karwa

Adv. NIL

Jogindarlal Hansraj Rajpal

Adv. NIL

Ramesh Suryabhan Diwate

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM

01-04-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Evidence

13-01-2026

Evidence

05-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

23-04-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by defendants 4-6 seeking permission to file their written statement beyond the statutory period was allowed. The court granted them permission to file the written statement subject to payment of Rs. 600/- as costs to the plaintiffs, holding that allowing the defendants to contest the matter would ensure a fair trial and serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by defendants 4-6 seeking permission to file their written statement beyond the statutory period was allowed. The court granted them permission to file the written statement subject to payment of Rs. 600/- as costs to the plaintiffs, holding that allowing the defendants to contest the matter would ensure a fair trial and serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case