Gause Raja Mohammad Tayyab vs Rabiya Mohammd Eliyas Ansari — 90/2025
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 8(2),9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH070011542025
e-Filing Number
29-11-2025
Filing Number
475/2025
Filing Date
01-12-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
01-12-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gause Raja Mohammad Tayyab
Adv. AHER SUDARSHAN JAGANNATH
Mohammad Firoz Mohammad Ilyas Ansari
Adv. AHER SUDARSHAN JAGANNATH
Respondent(s)
Rabiya Mohammd Eliyas Ansari
Mohammad Ekbal Mohammad Eliyas Ansari
Mohammad Makabul Mohammad Eliyas Ansari
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted permission to applicant no. 2 (father) to mortgage a jointly-owned property on behalf of his minor son (applicant no. 1) to obtain a housing loan from State Bank of India for house construction, finding the mortgage was for the minor's welfare and benefit. The court imposed conditions requiring the mortgage proceeds be used solely for house construction and that a detailed account of fund utilization be submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted permission to applicant no. 2 (father) to mortgage a jointly-owned property on behalf of his minor son (applicant no. 1) to obtain a housing loan from State Bank of India for house construction, finding the mortgage was for the minor's welfare and benefit. The court imposed conditions requiring the mortgage proceeds be used solely for house construction and that a detailed account of fund utilization be submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts