Thakubai Rajaram Chaudhary vs Sahadev Kondaji Chaudhari Advocate - Jorvekar N. A. — 100105/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41,96. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH070003172012
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100105/2012
Filing Date
16-07-2012
Registration No
100105/2012
Registration Date
17-07-2012
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thakubai Rajaram Chaudhary
Adv. Waman J. H.
Respondent(s)
Sahadev Kondaji Chaudhari Advocate - Jorvekar N. A.
Parsharam Kondaji Chaudhari
Parvatabai Kondaji Chaudhari
Pushpalata Sahadu Chaudhari
Sunita Parashram Chaudhari
Ravindra Parashram Chaudhari
Rakhamabai Kashinath Jadhav(Dead)(Legal Heir)
Rahibai Maruti Hande
Narangibai Vitthal Kanwade
Aashabai Shantaram Bhor
Sundarabai Balasaheb Kanawade
Sharadabai Shivaji Kale
Annasaheb Savleram Chaudhari
Bababai Dadabhau Chaudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the appellant's application for interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month pending appeal. The judge found that although the appellant's original partition suit was partly decreed, she is in possession of 49 units of agricultural land (over 1 acre) in Survey Nos. 51/2 and 51/4, constituting an independent source of income sufficient for self-maintenance. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs awarded against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the appellant's application for interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month pending appeal. The judge found that although the appellant's original partition suit was partly decreed, she is in possession of 49 units of agricultural land (over 1 acre) in Survey Nos. 51/2 and 51/4, constituting an independent source of income sufficient for self-maintenance. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs awarded against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts