Aditya Jagdish Shelke vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Kolhe B. G. — 83/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH070002352026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
141/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
83/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge, Sangamner
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
15
Police Station
Sangamner City Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aditya Jagdish Shelke
Adv. Adv siddhi prakash vaidya
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Kolhe B. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge, Sangamner
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Reply Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Order | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court granted bail to the accused Aditya Jagdish Shelke in this cybercrime case involving blackmail, non-consensual intimate imagery, and threats against a young woman. While acknowledging serious charges under IPC Sections 78, 351(4), 356(2) and the IT Act Section 67A, the Additional Sessions Judge found that investigation was complete with a chargesheet filed, making lengthy custody unnecessary. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹60,000 with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim/witnesses and interference with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court granted bail to the accused Aditya Jagdish Shelke in this cybercrime case involving blackmail, non-consensual intimate imagery, and threats against a young woman. While acknowledging serious charges under IPC Sections 78, 351(4), 356(2) and the IT Act Section 67A, the Additional Sessions Judge found that investigation was complete with a chargesheet filed, making lengthy custody unnecessary. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹60,000 with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim/witnesses and interference with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts