Kiran Damu Ekhande vs State of Maharashtra — 68/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH070002122026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
122/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
68/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
6-District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Akole Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kiran Damu Ekhande
Adv. Dhumal K. D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court rejected the bail application of Kiran Damu Ekhande, accused of offenses under IPC sections 498(a), 406, 323, 504, and 506. The judge found that the applicant deliberately absented himself from court proceedings since 2019, causing the case to stall for over 7 years, and only appeared after coercive measures (NBW, proclamation, property attachment) were taken, thereby disqualifying him from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
06-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
04-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
27-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2026
The court rejected the bail application of Kiran Damu Ekhande, accused of offenses under IPC sections 498(a), 406, 323, 504, and 506. The judge found that the applicant deliberately absented himself from court proceedings since 2019, causing the case to stall for over 7 years, and only appeared after coercive measures (NBW, proclamation, property attachment) were taken, thereby disqualifying him from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts