Puja Ravindra Sonwane vs The State Of Maharashatra — 46/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAH070001562026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
84/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
6-District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1086
Police Station
Sangamner City Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Puja Ravindra Sonwane
Adv. BHONGALE DHANJAY ARJUN
Amit Sitaram Shelake
Adv. BHONGALE DHANJAY ARJUN
Ramdas Laxman Suralkar
Adv. BHONGALE DHANJAY ARJUN
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashatra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 27-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of three applicants (Puja Ravindra Sonawane, Amit Sitaram Shelke, and Ramdas Laxman Suralkar) accused of conspiring to fraudulently sell Methodist Church property through forged documents and fake authority figures, involving Rs. 10 lakhs. The court found their roles went beyond mere witnesses and determined that custodial interrogation was essential for investigation, with high risks of evidence tampering and witness manipulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of three applicants (Puja Ravindra Sonawane, Amit Sitaram Shelke, and Ramdas Laxman Suralkar) accused of conspiring to fraudulently sell Methodist Church property through forged documents and fake authority figures, involving Rs. 10 lakhs. The court found their roles went beyond mere witnesses and determined that custodial interrogation was essential for investigation, with high risks of evidence tampering and witness manipulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts