Sudam Genuji Fatangare vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Deshmukh D. D. — 100018/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ---. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH070000531993
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100018/2012
Filing Date
09-03-1993
Registration No
100018/2012
Registration Date
05-03-2012
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
6-District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudam Genuji Fatangare
Adv. Gund V. S.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Deshmukh D. D.
The Tahsildar
The Chief Officer
The Chief Exe. Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-3 And Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court of Sangamner partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal against the lower court's dismissal of his compensation suit. The court held that the government's incomplete construction of a water percolation tank's waste-weir and missing guard wall constituted negligence, rejecting the defendants' "Act of God" defense. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs. 1 lakh with 8% annual interest from the suit's filing date, finding that human fault (incomplete infrastructure) caused the damage to his well and pump house during 1988 heavy rains, not natural forces alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court of Sangamner partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal against the lower court's dismissal of his compensation suit. The court held that the government's incomplete construction of a water percolation tank's waste-weir and missing guard wall constituted negligence, rejecting the defendants' "Act of God" defense. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs. 1 lakh with 8% annual interest from the suit's filing date, finding that human fault (incomplete infrastructure) caused the damage to his well and pump house during 1988 heavy rains, not natural forces alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts