Balvir Rupdas Adhikari vs Sunanda Ramdas Vaishnav Advocate - Kangne V. K. — 4/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAH070000502025
e-Filing Number
09-01-2025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
09-Jan-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
09-Jan-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balvir Rupdas Adhikari
Adv. Thorat S. P.
-
2.Raghuvir Purushottam Adhikari Bairagi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunanda Ramdas Vaishnav Advocate - Kangne V. K.
-
2.Madhav Laxman Bairagi
-
3.Shakuntala Shankar Bairagi
-
4.Mangla Ashok Vaishnav
-
5.Usha Nandkumar Vaishnav
-
6.Nirmala Namdev Gavad
-
7.Shatakshi Hemant Risbud
-
8.Madhuri Akhilesh Sharma
-
9.Duyyam Nibandhak Saheb
-
10.Duyyam Nibandhak Saheb 2
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application by appellants Balveer Adhikari and another to stay the trial court's injunction order was rejected. The court found that the trial court's order was legally sound based on evidence showing respondent no. 1 (Sunanda Vaishnaw) has proven possession of the ancestral suit properties since 1992, and the appellants admitted this possession and failed to claim their own possession or seek partition. Therefore, there was no valid reason to stay the injunction restraining the appellants from obstructing the respondent's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Steps
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
24-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
20-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
27-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
07-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Sangamner
-
16-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2025
Summary: The application by appellants Balveer Adhikari and another to stay the trial court's injunction order was rejected. The court found that the trial court's order was legally sound based on evidence showing respondent no. 1 (Sunanda Vaishnaw) has proven possession of the ancestral suit properties since 1992, and the appellants admitted this possession and failed to claim their own possession or seek partition. Therefore, there was no valid reason to stay the injunction restraining the appellants from obstructing the respondent's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts