Rahul Shivaji Gulve vs Vikas Hanmanta Ware Advocate - Sable A. A. — 19/2016
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHAH070000402016
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2016
Filing Date
15-01-2016
Registration No
19/2016
Registration Date
16-01-2016
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahul Shivaji Gulve
Adv. Gund V. S., Deshmukh Nishant V.
Respondent(s)
Vikas Hanmanta Ware Advocate - Sable A. A.
New India Assurance Comp.Ltd.
Adv. Sable A. A.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the insurance company's (Respondent No. 2) application and granted it leave to contest the motor accident death compensation petition on all available defences. This was permitted under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, since the vehicle owner/driver (Respondent No. 1) failed to file an appearance despite service of notice, raising suspicions of collusion with the claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the insurance company's (Respondent No. 2) application and granted it leave to contest the motor accident death compensation petition on all available defences. This was permitted under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, since the vehicle owner/driver (Respondent No. 1) failed to file an appearance despite service of notice, raising suspicions of collusion with the claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts