Al Quresh Exports Throuth its Partner vs Al Fateh Global food stuff Throug its Partner — 1/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Trust Suit - Civil Suit concerning Trust matters
CNR: MHAH070000242022
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
06-01-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
07-01-2022
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
8-District Judge 2 and Additional Sessions Judge,Sangamner
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Al Quresh Exports Throuth its Partner
Shakir Qureshi
Adv. Gund V. S.
Al Quresh Exports Throuth its Partner
Yakub Kureshi
Respondent(s)
Al Fateh Global food stuff Throug its Partner
Ayaz shaikh Advocate - Gonge S. H.
Al Fateh Global food stuff Through its partner
Saif Ayaz Shaikh
Javedh Chaudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge 2 and Additional Sessions Judge,Sangamner
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Al Quresh Exports v. Al Fateha Global Food Stuff (Commercial Suit No. 01/2022) The plaintiff's application for attachment of defendant's properties before judgment has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for recovery of Rs. 17,45,05,457, holding that the amounts paid to defendants were slaughtering service charges (Rs. 400 per animal), not investments or deposits, and lacked proper documentation of claimed losses from machinery and profits earned during operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Al Quresh Exports v. Al Fateha Global Food Stuff (Commercial Suit No. 01/2022) The plaintiff's application for attachment of defendant's properties before judgment has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for recovery of Rs. 17,45,05,457, holding that the amounts paid to defendants were slaughtering service charges (Rs. 400 per animal), not investments or deposits, and lacked proper documentation of claimed losses from machinery and profits earned during operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts