The State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Pralhad Pawar — 505/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),333,115(2),352,351(2),324(4),189(2),190,191(2),191(3),329(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH060023482025

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

2347/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

505/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur

Judge

1-Jt.CJJD and JMFC

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1172

Police Station

Shrirampur City Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),333,115(2),352,351(2),324(4),189(2),190,191(2),191(3),329(1)
Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Pralhad Pawar

  2. 2.Manoj Dipak Jadhav

    Adv. null

  3. 3.Prathamesh Bhausaheb Shendge

    Adv. null

  4. 4.Usha Pralhad Pawar

    Adv. null

  5. 5.Sima Macchindra Salunke

    Adv. null

  6. 6.Anjali Dipak jadhav

    Adv. null

  7. 7.Poonam Santosh Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case 505/2025 Summary The Maharashtra First Class Magistrate's Court in Shrirampur acquitted all seven defendants (Santosh Pralhad Pawar, Manoj Dipak Jadhav, Prathamesh Bhausaheb Shendge, Ursha Pralhad Pawar, Sima Machchind Salunke, Anjali Dipak Jadhav, and Punam Santosh Pawar) of charges under IPC 2023 sections 118, 191, 333, 115, 352, 351, 324, 189, 190, 329 and Arms Act section 4/25 on March 27, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite medical evidence and injury reports, as key witnesses (complainant and associated witnesses) retracted support for prosecution charges, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish the violent group assault and weapons possession alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  11. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

  13. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  14. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

  15. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

  16. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

  17. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  18. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  19. 08-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  21. 10-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 505/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 505/2025 Summary The Maharashtra First Class Magistrate's Court in Shrirampur acquitted all seven defendants (Santosh Pralhad Pawar, Manoj Dipak Jadhav, Prathamesh Bhausaheb Shendge, Ursha Pralhad Pawar, Sima Machchind Salunke, Anjali Dipak Jadhav, and Punam Santosh Pawar) of charges under IPC 2023 sections 118, 191, 333, 115, 352, 351, 324, 189, 190, 329 and Arms Act section 4/25 on March 27, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite medical evidence and injury reports, as key witnesses (complainant and associated witnesses) retracted support for prosecution charges, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish the violent group assault and weapons possession alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case