Priyanka Sagar Bankar vs Sagar Bhausaheb Bankar Advocate - Bharaskar R. D. — 394/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH060017332024

e-Filing Number

29-07-2024

Filing Number

1733/2024

Filing Date

29-Jul-2024

Registration No

394/2024

Registration Date

29-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur

Judge

1-Jt.CJJD and JMFC

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Priyanka Sagar Bankar

    Adv. Kulkarni S. V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Bhausaheb Bankar Advocate - Bharaskar R. D.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 394/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition. The court found that Priyanka Sagar Bankar (petitioner) adequately proved her husband Sagar Bhausaheb Bankar's neglect and abandonment. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of ₹3,000 to the petitioner from the date of filing the petition, plus ₹1,000 toward case costs. Key Reasoning: The judge determined that the petitioner established grounds for spousal maintenance under IPC Section 144 (2023) by proving the respondent's cruelty, financial abandonment, and refusal to support her. The respondent's counter-claims lacked substantive evidence, while the petitioner's testimony remained credible and supported by applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  16. 04-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  21. 07-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  24. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  25. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  26. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  27. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  28. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  29. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  30. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  31. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  32. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  33. 03-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  34. 04-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  35. 01-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  36. 30-Aug-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  37. 30-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 29-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 394/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 394/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition. The court found that Priyanka Sagar Bankar (petitioner) adequately proved her husband Sagar Bhausaheb Bankar's neglect and abandonment. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of ₹3,000 to the petitioner from the date of filing the petition, plus ₹1,000 toward case costs. Key Reasoning: The judge determined that the petitioner established grounds for spousal maintenance under IPC Section 144 (2023) by proving the respondent's cruelty, financial abandonment, and refusal to support her. The respondent's counter-claims lacked substantive evidence, while the petitioner's testimony remained credible and supported by applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case