Triveni Tejas Naik vs Sunita Nitin Naik Advocate - Chaudante T. K. — 371/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH060015982023

e-Filing Number

14-07-2023

Filing Number

1596/2023

Filing Date

17-Jul-2023

Registration No

371/2023

Registration Date

18-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur

Judge

4-2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23
Ia/1/2024 Classification : Interim Maintenance Under Section 125 Section Triveni Tejas NaikTejas Nitin Naik

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Triveni Tejas Naik

    Adv. Gadekar R. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunita Nitin Naik Advocate - Chaudante T. K.

  2. 2.Tejas Nitin Naik

    Adv. Chaudante T. K.

  3. 3.Hrithik Nitin Naik

    Adv. Chaudante T. K.

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  11. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  13. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  14. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  15. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  16. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  17. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  18. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  19. 25-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: Criminal M.A. No. 371/2023 Outcome: Applications rejected; no criminal inquiry initiated. Triveni Naik sought to initiate criminal action under Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that Respondent No. 2 (Tejas Nitin Naik) filed false bank account statements and made false statements regarding his salary (₹30,000/month vs. actual ₹58,000-76,000/month at Liber India Pvt. Ltd.) in an affidavit of assets and liabilities filed in a Domestic Violence Act maintenance proceeding. The court rejected both applications, finding that while the respondent's false statements were evident, criminal action was not expedient in the interests of justice. The court applied precedent holding that false documents prepared before court filing and affidavits with minimal impact on the broader administration of justice do not warrant criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  21. 24-Oct-2024

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  22. 16-Oct-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  23. 14-Oct-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  24. 23-Sep-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  25. 09-Sep-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  26. 13-Aug-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  27. 29-Jul-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  28. 16-Jul-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  29. 26-Jun-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  30. 21-May-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  31. 21-May-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  32. 18-May-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  33. 10-May-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  34. 30-Apr-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  35. 22-Apr-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  36. 10-Apr-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  37. 05-Apr-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  38. 01-Apr-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  39. 28-Mar-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  40. 12-Mar-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  41. 05-Mar-2024

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  42. 02-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  43. 16-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  44. 13-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  45. 30-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  46. 24-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  47. 18-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  48. 09-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  49. 22-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  50. 09-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  51. 29-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  52. 31-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  53. 07-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  54. 27-Sep-2023

    Reply Unready

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  55. 11-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  56. 01-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC

  57. 19-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 17-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 371/2023

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Criminal M.A. No. 371/2023 Outcome: Applications rejected; no criminal inquiry initiated. Triveni Naik sought to initiate criminal action under Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that Respondent No. 2 (Tejas Nitin Naik) filed false bank account statements and made false statements regarding his salary (₹30,000/month vs. actual ₹58,000-76,000/month at Liber India Pvt. Ltd.) in an affidavit of assets and liabilities filed in a Domestic Violence Act maintenance proceeding. The court rejected both applications, finding that while the respondent's false statements were evident, criminal action was not expedient in the interests of justice. The court applied precedent holding that false documents prepared before court filing and affidavits with minimal impact on the broader administration of justice do not warrant criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case