The State of Maharashtra vs Milind Sakharam Navale Advocate - Baraskar R. D. — 78/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,324,323,504,506. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH060004492019
Filing Number
449/2019
Filing Date
01-Mar-2019
Registration No
78/2019
Registration Date
01-Mar-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur
Judge
1-Jt.CJJD and JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
Loni Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Milind Sakharam Navale Advocate - Baraskar R. D.
-
2.Sakharam Bhikaji Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
3.Appasaheb Bhikaji Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
4.Gautam Sakharam Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
5.Dhiraj Appasaheb Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
6.Ashok Bapurao Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
7.Anjani Sakharam Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
8.Sanjivani Gautam Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
-
9.Kamal Appasaheb Navale
Adv. Baraskar R. D.
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
08-May-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
23-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: The State of Maharashtra v/s. Milind Sakharam Nawale (RCC 78/2019) Outcome: Application rejected. Accused Milind Sakharam Nawale sought discharge from Section 324 IPC charges by altering the charge under Section 216 CrPC, arguing the essential ingredients of that section were absent. The court rejected the application, holding that discharge remedies are available only prior to charge framing under Sections 227 and 239 CrPC. Once charges are framed, the court becomes functus officio; the only options are charge alteration under Section 216 or acquittal after trial if prosecution fails to prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
19-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
15-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
30-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
08-May-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
10-Apr-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
26-Jul-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
20-Jun-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
23-Mar-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
19-Jan-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
28-Nov-2022
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
06-Oct-2022
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
24-Aug-2022
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
09-Jun-2022
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
26-Apr-2022
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
23-Mar-2022
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
25-Jan-2022
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
09-Dec-2021
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
11-Oct-2021
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
30-Aug-2021
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
08-Jul-2021
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
17-Apr-2021
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
12-Feb-2021
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
26-Nov-2020
Evidence
4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC
-
06-Oct-2020
Evidence
4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC
-
07-Jul-2020
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
06-Apr-2020
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
17-Feb-2020
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
09-Jan-2020
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
21-Nov-2019
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
14-Oct-2019
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
28-Aug-2019
Evidence
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
25-Jul-2019
Hearing
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
05-Jul-2019
Charge
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
10-Jun-2019
Charge
2 Jt.CJJD and JMFC
-
02-May-2019
Charge
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Shrirampur
-
01-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 78/2019
Case Summary: The State of Maharashtra v/s. Milind Sakharam Nawale (RCC 78/2019) Outcome: Application rejected. Accused Milind Sakharam Nawale sought discharge from Section 324 IPC charges by altering the charge under Section 216 CrPC, arguing the essential ingredients of that section were absent. The court rejected the application, holding that discharge remedies are available only prior to charge framing under Sections 227 and 239 CrPC. Once charges are framed, the court becomes functus officio; the only options are charge alteration under Section 216 or acquittal after trial if prosecution fails to prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts