Afjal Badal Pathan vs The State of Maharashtra, City Police Station Shrirampur — 113/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH060004312026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
431/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
113/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur
Judge
4-2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Afjal Badal Pathan
-
2.Nababbi Badal Pathan
-
3.Muskan Shabbir Shaikh
-
4.Jamila Mukhtar Shah
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra, City Police Station Shrirampur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the application and ordered release of seized gas cylinders to the applicants in interim custody upon furnishing indemnity bonds of Rs. 20,000 each. The court found it had jurisdiction to grant relief since no confiscation proceeding was pending before the District Collector under the Essential Commodities Act, and the applicants established ownership through verified consumer documents. The release was conditional on producing articles at trial, refraining from sale or creating third-party interests, and furnishing a supurtnama to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Apr-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-Apr-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Mar-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
25-Mar-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply Unready
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 113/2026
The court allowed the application and ordered release of seized gas cylinders to the applicants in interim custody upon furnishing indemnity bonds of Rs. 20,000 each. The court found it had jurisdiction to grant relief since no confiscation proceeding was pending before the District Collector under the Essential Commodities Act, and the applicants established ownership through verified consumer documents. The release was conditional on producing articles at trial, refraining from sale or creating third-party interests, and furnishing a supurtnama to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts