Ashwini Shantwan Amolik vs Shantwan Hari Amolik Advocate - Bhosle R. D. — 124/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH060004272025

e-Filing Number

13-03-2025

Filing Number

426/2025

Filing Date

13-Mar-2025

Registration No

124/2025

Registration Date

13-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur

Judge

7-4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashwini Shantwan Amolik

    Adv. Dhasal Vaijayanta L.

  2. 2.Harshad Shantwan Amolik

    Adv. Dhasal Vaijayanta L.

  3. 3.Yash Shantwan Amolik

    Adv. Dhasal Vaijayanta L.

  4. 4.Anush Shantwan Amolik

    Adv. Dhasal Vaijayanta L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shantwan Hari Amolik Advocate - Bhosle R. D.

  2. 2.Hari Sahebrao Amolik

    Adv. NIL

  3. 3.Manda Hari Amolik

    Adv. Bhosale R. B.

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 124/2025 Court: First Class Magistrate Court, Shrirampur Order Date: February 26, 2026 The court granted the respondent's application for exemption from personal appearance and extension of time to file their statement/reply. The court noted the respondent had been present for approximately 11 months but repeatedly sought adjournments and failed to file their response despite being given roughly 5 months previously. Finding the respondent guilty of delay tactics, the court nevertheless granted a final opportunity applying principles of natural justice. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹1,000 as costs to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  11. 30-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  13. 02-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  16. 12-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  18. 04-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 31-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  21. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  22. 05-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  23. 23-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  24. 16-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  25. 16-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    4th Jt.CJJJD and JMFC

  26. 15-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 13-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 124/2025 Court: First Class Magistrate Court, Shrirampur Order Date: February 26, 2026 The court granted the respondent's application for exemption from personal appearance and extension of time to file their statement/reply. The court noted the respondent had been present for approximately 11 months but repeatedly sought adjournments and failed to file their response despite being given roughly 5 months previously. Finding the respondent guilty of delay tactics, the court nevertheless granted a final opportunity applying principles of natural justice. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹1,000 as costs to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case