Kunal Gautam Ingale vs The State of Maharashtra, Shrirampur City Police Station — 102/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH060004022026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

402/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur

Judge

1-Jt.CJJD and JMFC

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kunal Gautam Ingale

    Adv. Sunny Prakash Ghorpade

  2. 2.Kalpana Anna Pathare

    Adv. Sunny Prakash Ghorpade

  3. 3.Sujit Aabasaheb Dhokchaule

    Adv. Sunny Prakash Ghorpade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra, Shrirampur City Police Station

  2. 2.Shafiq Rashid Qureshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the application for return of seized property under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicants demonstrated legal possession of a Toyota Innova vehicle and two mobile phones seized in connection with an Arms Act case, supported by registration certificates, purchase receipts, and identity documents. The court found that continued police detention was unnecessary and granted temporary custody of the items to the applicants upon executing indemnity bonds (₹5,00,000 for vehicle; ₹15,000 and ₹40,000 for mobiles) with conditions prohibiting illegal use, requiring production during trial, and prohibiting transfer or modification without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  6. 04-Jun-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  7. 01-Jun-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  8. 28-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  9. 08-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  10. 02-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  11. 30-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  12. 28-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  13. 24-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  14. 20-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  15. 17-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  16. 15-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  17. 09-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  18. 06-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  19. 27-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  20. 17-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC

  21. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application for return of seized property under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicants demonstrated legal possession of a Toyota Innova vehicle and two mobile phones seized in connection with an Arms Act case, supported by registration certificates, purchase receipts, and identity documents. The court found that continued police detention was unnecessary and granted temporary custody of the items to the applicants upon executing indemnity bonds (₹5,00,000 for vehicle; ₹15,000 and ₹40,000 for mobiles) with conditions prohibiting illegal use, requiring production during trial, and prohibiting transfer or modification without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case