The State of Maharashtra, City Police Station Shrirampur vs Vilas Sukhdev Potphode Advocate - NIL — 173/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH060003022024
e-Filing Number
16-12-2023
Filing Number
302/2024
Filing Date
06-Feb-2024
Registration No
173/2024
Registration Date
06-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur
Judge
4-2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1253
Police Station
Shrirampur City Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra, City Police Station Shrirampur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vilas Sukhdev Potphode Advocate - NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court discharged Vilas Sukhdev Potphode from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide a chemical analyzer report proving the seized article contained alcohol—essential evidence for conviction. The proceedings were stopped under Section 258 CrPC, and all bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 173/2024
The court discharged Vilas Sukhdev Potphode from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide a chemical analyzer report proving the seized article contained alcohol—essential evidence for conviction. The proceedings were stopped under Section 258 CrPC, and all bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts