Imran Hasan Shaikh vs The State of Maharashtra, City Police Station Shrirampur — 51/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH060001692026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shrirampur

Judge

5-3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

1.Imran Hasan Shaikh

Respondent(s)

1.The State of Maharashtra, City Police Station Shrirampur

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
17-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court allowed Imran Hasan Shaikh's application to recover his seized VIVO V29E mobile phone, finding him to be the rightful owner with no competing claims and noting that prolonged police custody risked damage to the device's value. The court released the phone subject to conditions including an indemnity bond of Rs. 12,000, documentary evidence through photographs and panchnama, and undertakings that the applicant would not sell or transfer the property without court permission and would produce it as directed during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
17-Mar-2026

Disposed

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
16-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
13-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
12-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
27-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
23-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
20-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
16-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
10-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

3rd Jt.CJJD and JMFC
05-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
04-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 51/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Imran Hasan Shaikh's application to recover his seized VIVO V29E mobile phone, finding him to be the rightful owner with no competing claims and noting that prolonged police custody risked damage to the device's value. The court released the phone subject to conditions including an indemnity bond of Rs. 12,000, documentary evidence through photographs and panchnama, and undertakings that the applicant would not sell or transfer the property without court permission and would produce it as directed during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.