The State of Maharashtra vs Bhausaheb Devidas Kotkar Advocate - NIL — 13958/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(E). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030171572025
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17155/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
13958/2025
Registration Date
15-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
The State Excise Department
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bhausaheb Devidas Kotkar Advocate - NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 13958/2025) against Bhausaheb Kothkar for illegal liquor trafficking, the court examined witness testimony and the accused's cross-examination on 01/04/2026. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the case being dismissed (उलटतपास पुर्ण - case closed without conviction). The accused was acquitted as the evidence did not establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 13958/2025) against Bhausaheb Kothkar for illegal liquor trafficking, the court examined witness testimony and the accused's cross-examination on 01/04/2026. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the case being dismissed (उलटतपास पुर्ण - case closed without conviction). The accused was acquitted as the evidence did not establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts