The State of Maharashtra vs Bhausaheb Devidas Kotkar Advocate - NIL — 13958/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(E). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH030171572025

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

17155/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

13958/2025

Registration Date

15-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar

Judge

29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM

FIR Details

FIR Number

338

Police Station

The State Excise Department

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(A)(E)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Bhausaheb Devidas Kotkar Advocate - NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM

01-04-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

30-01-2026

Evidence

24-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

30-01-2026
Plea
01-04-2026
Evidence

Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 13958/2025) against Bhausaheb Kothkar for illegal liquor trafficking, the court examined witness testimony and the accused's cross-examination on 01/04/2026. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the case being dismissed (उलटतपास पुर्ण - case closed without conviction). The accused was acquitted as the evidence did not establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 13958/2025) against Bhausaheb Kothkar for illegal liquor trafficking, the court examined witness testimony and the accused's cross-examination on 01/04/2026. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the case being dismissed (उलटतपास पुर्ण - case closed without conviction). The accused was acquitted as the evidence did not establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case