The State of Maharashtra vs Bhausaheb Devidas Kotkar Advocate - NIL — 13958/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(E). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-May-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH030171572025

Filing Number

17155/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

13958/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar

Judge

29-4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

338

Police Station

The State Excise Department

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhausaheb Devidas Kotkar Advocate - NIL

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 13958/2025) against Bhausaheb Kothkar for illegal liquor trafficking, the court examined witness testimony and the accused's cross-examination on 01/04/2026. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the case being dismissed (उलटतपास पुर्ण - case closed without conviction). The accused was acquitted as the evidence did not establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    PleaView PDF

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13958/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 13958/2025) against Bhausaheb Kothkar for illegal liquor trafficking, the court examined witness testimony and the accused's cross-examination on 01/04/2026. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the case being dismissed (उलटतपास पुर्ण - case closed without conviction). The accused was acquitted as the evidence did not establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case