The State of Maharashtra vs Amol Vaijinath Galhate Advocate - NIL — 1511/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,3(5). Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030170182025
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17016/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
1511/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
23-Chief Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
872
Police Station
Tophkhana Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Amol Vaijinath Galhate Advocate - NIL
Mangesh Valmik Shahane
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 23-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Judgment
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 09-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No.: FIR 1511/2025 | Accused: Mangesh Valmik Shaane (Age 18) Charge: Chain snatching (under BNSS 2023, Section 351) Outcome: The accused was examined under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The accused denied all allegations against him, stating that the prosecution's evidence regarding the chain snatching incidents (dated 30/07/2024 and testimony from multiple witnesses) was false. The court recorded the accused's statement and his defense statement was admitted. The case proceeds to judgment based on the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the accused's defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No.: FIR 1511/2025 | Accused: Mangesh Valmik Shaane (Age 18) Charge: Chain snatching (under BNSS 2023, Section 351) Outcome: The accused was examined under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The accused denied all allegations against him, stating that the prosecution's evidence regarding the chain snatching incidents (dated 30/07/2024 and testimony from multiple witnesses) was false. The court recorded the accused's statement and his defense statement was admitted. The case proceeds to judgment based on the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the accused's defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts