HDFC Bank Ltd vs Bharat Karabhari Dahatonde Advocate - NIL — 11899/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section 25. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH030146482025

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

14647/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

11899/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar

Judge

24-17th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC Bank Ltd

    Adv. Padir S. G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Karabhari Dahatonde Advocate - NIL

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    18th Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM

  3. 29-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court issued process (summons) against accused Bharat Karabhari Dahatonde for offences punishable under Section 25 of The Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, based on the complaint filed by H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd. The court found the complaint was filed within the limitation period and that sufficient grounds existed to proceed. Service of summons by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (R.P.A.D.) was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11899/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court issued process (summons) against accused Bharat Karabhari Dahatonde for offences punishable under Section 25 of The Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, based on the complaint filed by H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd. The court found the complaint was filed within the limitation period and that sufficient grounds existed to proceed. Service of summons by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (R.P.A.D.) was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case