Pawan Nagari Sahakari Patsastha Maryadit vs Gopal Bhojaraj Vadhavani Advocate - NIL — 8950/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments (amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030110412024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
20-09-2024
Filing Number
11038/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
8950/2024
Registration Date
03-10-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pawan Nagari Sahakari Patsastha Maryadit
Adv. RASHINKAR AMIT VIJAY
Respondent(s)
Gopal Bhojaraj Vadhavani Advocate - NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 8950/2024 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar, the court completed the examination of the complainant's (Gopal Wadhwani) evidence on 21/01/2026. Various documentary evidence including affidavits, resolutions, bank documents, notices, postal receipts, account statements, loan demand applications, and promissory notes were admitted and marked as exhibits (Exs. 28-38). The case has been adjourned for the accused's cross-examination of the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 8950/2024 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar, the court completed the examination of the complainant's (Gopal Wadhwani) evidence on 21/01/2026. Various documentary evidence including affidavits, resolutions, bank documents, notices, postal receipts, account statements, loan demand applications, and promissory notes were admitted and marked as exhibits (Exs. 28-38). The case has been adjourned for the accused's cross-examination of the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts