The State of Maharashtra vs Kumar Dadabhau Falke Advocate - NIL — 6514/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH030080482024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8046/2024

Filing Date

12-07-2024

Registration No

6514/2024

Registration Date

15-07-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar

Judge

29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

485

Police Station

Nagar Taluka Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Kumar Dadabhau Falke Advocate - NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Arguments

20-03-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judge of Ahmednagar acquitted Kumar Dadabhaau Falke of charges under Section 65(E)(F) of the Mumbai Liquor Ban Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide chemical analysis reports of seized substances and did not record statements from key witnesses (the second panch and excise officer), creating reasonable doubt about the alleged illegal sale of 300 liters of raw syrup and 35 liters of country liquor. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered his release with a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

02-09-2025
Evidence
11-09-2025
Evidence
22-12-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judge of Ahmednagar acquitted Kumar Dadabhaau Falke of charges under Section 65(E)(F) of the Mumbai Liquor Ban Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide chemical analysis reports of seized substances and did not record statements from key witnesses (the second panch and excise officer), creating reasonable doubt about the alleged illegal sale of 300 liters of raw syrup and 35 liters of country liquor. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered his release with a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case