The State of Maharashtra vs Kumar Dadabhau Falke Advocate - NIL — 6514/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030080482024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8046/2024
Filing Date
12-07-2024
Registration No
6514/2024
Registration Date
15-07-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
485
Police Station
Nagar Taluka Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kumar Dadabhau Falke Advocate - NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 29-4th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judge of Ahmednagar acquitted Kumar Dadabhaau Falke of charges under Section 65(E)(F) of the Mumbai Liquor Ban Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide chemical analysis reports of seized substances and did not record statements from key witnesses (the second panch and excise officer), creating reasonable doubt about the alleged illegal sale of 300 liters of raw syrup and 35 liters of country liquor. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered his release with a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judge of Ahmednagar acquitted Kumar Dadabhaau Falke of charges under Section 65(E)(F) of the Mumbai Liquor Ban Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide chemical analysis reports of seized substances and did not record statements from key witnesses (the second panch and excise officer), creating reasonable doubt about the alleged illegal sale of 300 liters of raw syrup and 35 liters of country liquor. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered his release with a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts